From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 17:10:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C7F5DF for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0523BEC for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7MHA71J006609 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:10:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192878] comms/pr [maintainer] new source location Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:10:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:10:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192878 --- Comment #21 from John Marino --- You don't understand how DOCS and PORTDOCS works. They should be enabled. It should install unconditionally. The staging mechanism will decide based on the state of the OPTION DOCS where or not to put it into the pkg-plist. This is why all references to %%PORTDOCS%% has to be removed from the pkg-plist too when it's used this way. It's the user that gets to decide if he wants docs. You've already basically got this 90% implemented, just finish it off. Read the second on in the porters handbook on PORTDOCS for more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.