Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 11:43:36 -0800 From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Message-ID: <21354.944423016@monkeys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 04 Dec 1999 22:46:01 -0800. <199912050646.WAA59445@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199912050646.WAA59445@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote: > So, I think it *IS* possible to make FreeBSD sufficiently bug-free that > people become 'surprised' when they are able to crash a box running it. FYI - Part of the reason that _I_ jumped onto the FreeBSD bandwagon (not that long ago) was that FreeBSD was advertised as being basically uncrashable. As you might imagine, I was rather disappointed to learn that the ``never crashes'' claims that I had read (on www.freebsd.org?) were not always true in practice... at least not on the heavily-stressed 2.2.8 system that I was running awhile back. (That system has now been taken out of service for reasons entirely unrelated to the OS.) Having said that however, I guess that I should also clarify that the crashes I had been experiencing with that 2.2.8 system might perhaps have been easily solved (at the time) if it had not been for an unfortunate combination of factors (i.e. swap partition having been allocated too small, more memory being added to the system) that made it impossible for me to get any sort of a system crash dump to analyze. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21354.944423016>