From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Aug 12 17:12:12 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA17E37B400
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755BB43E4A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from pool0130.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.130] helo=mindspring.com)
	by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 17ePHg-0005b3-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:11:41 -0700
Message-ID: <3D584E87.4EAB0D0E@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:10:47 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc: David Xu <bsddiy@yahoo.com>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>,
	FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c (fwd)
References: <20020812055315.7682.qmail@web20907.mail.yahoo.com> <20020812104959.GA1645@nagual.pp.ru> <3D579603.3FA86DD7@mindspring.com> <20020812113101.GA2089@nagual.pp.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > UGH!
> >
> > #1    License on patch is GPL
> 
> Why not Microsoft?

I don't unserstand the question.  Why not the same license that's
areleady on the source code for "su"?


> > #2    I guess now that this irritant is gone, the signals code
> >       will remain screwed up, until some time later when you
> >       see the shark fin above water, just before it bites
> >       someone else?
> 
> Read commit message 2 or 3 times. Meditate on each word.

I did.  It's still an order of operation problem in the kernel
during fork(), as Bruce pointed out in a later posting (so me
pointing it out here is probably redundant... 8-)).

I still think other code is going to have the problem, too, so
changing su alone doesn't fix things.  Better to not deliver
the tty output stopped signal.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message