Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:55:05 +0100
From:      Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To:        "Alex (DDS)" <akruijff@dds.nl>
Cc:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Neigaard <neigaard@e-box.dk>, Alex <FreeBSD@cybertron.tmfweb.nl>, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OT: Re: Max RAM supported by Hardware
Message-ID:  <20020221215504.GA31481@student.uu.se>
In-Reply-To: <3C75152A.7040705@dds.nl>
References:  <1556477954.20020220210026@e-box.dk> <14217053982.20020220215646@cybertron.tmfweb.nl> <15518324328.20020220221756@cybertron.tmfweb.nl> <20020220220028.GA21515@student.uu.se> <193651536.20020221082100@e-box.dk> <3C75152A.7040705@dds.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:41:30PM +0100, Alex (DDS) wrote:

> 
> >
> >
> >ET> On Alpha the max that is supported is 2G. I am not sure why that
> >ET> limitation exists but it does.
> >
> >Strange - It should be able to support much much more. I guess FreeBSD
> >is mostly for i386, right? Not much being done for other platforms?

More or less, yes.

> >
> The Alpha processor proberbly just doesn't support it. Thus doesn't have 
> the base and offset regestries and memory thats able to handle it.

Nope, the Alpha processors support much more memory than that.

The 21064 has 43-bit virtual and 34-bit physical addresses, while the
21164 has 43-bit virtual and 40-bit physical.
The Alpha architecture actually supports using up to 64-bit virtual
addresses but I don't think any of the current implementations actually
implement that.



-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221215504.GA31481>