Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:32:02 +1000
From:      Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To:        Abc Xyz <abc@anchorageinternet.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: traceroute precision
Message-ID:  <20020601223202.C552@k7.mavetju>
In-Reply-To: <200206011119.g51BJhT39093@groggy.anc.acsalaska.net>; from abc@anchorageinternet.org on Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:19:43AM %2B0000
References:  <200206011119.g51BJhT39093@groggy.anc.acsalaska.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:19:43AM +0000, Abc Xyz wrote:
> FBSD 4.5
> 
> i am not sure why this is, or if it is something
> that 'needs' correction - but if i traceroute
> from 2 different endpoints - to each other,
> i get VASTLY different results.  from what
> i understand of ICMP (tiny bit) this should
> not occur - ie - each hop should be measured
> individually regardless of the speed of the endpoints.

It should not occur if you had two the same tests. Right now you
have a test of going from a cablemodem to an analogue modem and a
test of going from an analogue modem to a cable modem.

Anyway, the thing you see is that the serialisation delay of an
analogue modem is much higher than that of a cablemodem. If you
reduce the speed of your cablemodem back to the speed of the analogue
modem, you will see it has the same values.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |           Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |        Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions:
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:   |                    http://www.FatalDimensions.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020601223202.C552>