From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 17 09:12:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D18E83D84 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 09:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC30569C6D for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 09:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from [134.76.11.225] (helo=email.stud.uni-goettingen.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eQV06-0003iv-FJ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:12:50 +0100 Received: from UM-EXCHT-A01.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.210) by um-excht-s1.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:12:50 +0100 Received: from krabat.raven.hur (91.8.156.113) by email.gwdg.de (134.76.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:12:49 +0100 Subject: Re: Flavor or not for this port? From: Rainer Hurling To: L.Bartoletti CC: References: <46cbd287-186f-9b92-f2a7-d6884c681040@gwdg.de> Message-ID: <37d007c1-0315-5b23-7357-5dc3fcb836fc@gwdg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:12:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46cbd287-186f-9b92-f2a7-d6884c681040@gwdg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 09:12:59 -0000 Am 02.11.2017 um 07:41 schrieb Rainer Hurling: > Am 02.11.2017 um 07:13 schrieb L.Bartoletti: >> Hi, >> >> I want to take x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-* >> >> Both are built for Qt4. I especially need qwt6 for Qt5. Since we have >> flavors. Is it better to add a Qt5 flavor for Qwt6 or simply add a >> x11-toolkits/qwt6-qt5 (like security/qtkeychain-qt{4,5} ?) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Regards. >> >> Loïc > > > Hi Loïc, > > Thanks for your dedication. I am very interested in a qwt6-qt5 port, > since it is needed for the upcoming version 3.0 of graphics/qgis :) > > Sorry for my inexperience. In case of adding the qwt6-qt5 as a flavor, > should we expect any change or restriction in the way, it would be used > as a dependency of e.g. QGIS? > > Thanks for any answer. > > Best wishes, > Rainer Hi Loïc, Again about x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-* Now, that we have our first real world experiences with FLAVORS, it seems to be functional to use flavors in this context. Something like x11-toolkits/qwt6@qt4 x11-toolkits/qwt6@qt5 A bit tricky could be, that USE_QT* are different in both cases: USE_QT4= corelib gui opengl svg xml moc_build USE_QT5= core gui opengl svg xml printsupport qmake_build widgets What do you think? Best wishes, Rainer