Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:22:53 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> Cc: archie@whistle.com, bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Panic plus advice needed Message-ID: <199908050622.AAA09178@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Aug 1999 07:13:32 %2B1000." <99Aug5.065409est.40327@border.alcanet.com.au> References: <99Aug5.065409est.40327@border.alcanet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <99Aug5.065409est.40327@border.alcanet.com.au> Peter Jeremy writes: : Someone with some free time on their hands might like to check thru : the egcs code to see if enabling debug can affect the code generation. : A quick check suggests that the relevant globals are write_symbols, : use_gnu_debug_info_extensions and debug_info_level. Generating SDB : debugging information (for COFF) definitely can change code alignment, : but working out if generating DBX debugging information has any effect : on the generated code would take more time than I can justify right : now. It is my belief that gcc 2.7.3.2 generates different code when -g is on the command line.... At least that's what I've seen from time to time with kernels. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908050622.AAA09178>