From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 12 14:20:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697F6D8C; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE61A3F; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3CEKhFi092047; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:20:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r3CEKhTT092044; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:20:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:20:42 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: RFC: Changing the documentation's font style. In-Reply-To: <20130412180742.3f2b220a@X220.ovitrap.com> Message-ID: References: <20130412180742.3f2b220a@X220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:20:43 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:20:46 -0000 On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:41:46 +0100 > Isabell Long wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I sent this idea to the #bsddocs IRC channel a few days ago and no-one >> there objected, but here you go. I'd like to know your opinions on the >> documentation font being changed from serif to sans-serif. This would >> only affect the web-based docs, not the ones being prepared for print. >> >> An example of this is at >> http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ , >> and a diff of my very simple changes is at >> http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/docs_font.diff >> >> In my opinion, it makes a hugely positive difference and modernises >> the look of the documentation set. >> > how old are you? > > The serif fonts are easier to read for older people. > > I agree, it looks more modern. But what is the idea behind a > documentation? Look good or being read by people for the content. Try viewing the two versions in side-by-side windows. The serif fonts were a lot blobbier and less sharp for me. Aliasing and antialiasing at work with limited resolution. Serif is easier to read in print, but that's much higher resolution.