From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 8 12:19:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA07817 for current-outgoing; Wed, 8 May 1996 12:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maki.wwa.com (maki.wwa.com [198.49.174.21]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA07808 for ; Wed, 8 May 1996 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wendigo.trans.sni-usa.com by maki.wwa.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0uHEiK-000rxkC; Wed, 8 May 96 14:15 CDT Received: from vogon.trans.sni-usa.com (vogon.trans.sni-usa.com [136.157.83.215]) by wendigo.trans.sni-usa.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA26005; Wed, 8 May 1996 13:41:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from shyam.trans.sni-usa.com (shyam.trans.sni-usa.com [136.157.82.43]) by vogon.trans.sni-usa.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA11611; Wed, 8 May 1996 13:50:53 -0500 From: hal@snitt.com (Hal Snyder) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: j@uriah.heep.sax.de, nash@mcs.com Subject: termios'ed getty Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 18:43:55 GMT Organization: Siemens Nixdorf Transportation Technologies Message-Id: <3190e2b7.14046416@vogon.trans.sni-usa.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99d/32.182 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 7 May 1996 23:29:29 +0200 (MET DST), J Wunsch wrote: > So now the US$ 4.99 question: what do people think about completely > ripping out support for the obsolete V7/oldBSD-style sgtty options in > getty? Does anybody know somebody who's really using all these > f0/f1/f2 flags in gettytab? > If nobody objects within reasonable time, i consider removing all the > compat cruft that's no longer needed. This is from memory of a few years ago when Coherent was moved from sgtty to termio: If iBCS2 compatibility is a consideration, there may still be SCO apps out there which expect the V7 calls. I suspect a fair number of them will never be recompiled. There are a dozen or so SCO-specific extensions to the standard iBCS2 system call table - including as I recall stty and gtty.