From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 18:48:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1584A16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu74-159-108.nc.rr.com [24.74.159.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A62943FAF for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:48:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) h9S2lduI004410; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:47:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20031028024243.GA99268@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20031028020425.GI1004@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <1067307067.48228.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20031028023458.GA99213@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20031028024243.GA99268@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zRTHSnA5Os37b4eXY6u4" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1067309283.48228.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:48:03 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test: Galeon 2 1.3.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 02:48:11 -0000 --=-zRTHSnA5Os37b4eXY6u4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 21:42, Simon Barner wrote: > > Did know that - sorry. But beware: I'll keep sending patches ;-) > s/Did/Didn't/ >=20 > I thought a maintainer gnome@ means the same as ports@. No. gnome@ is actually a living body of committers and users dedicated to GNOME on FreeBSD. Ports maintained by gnome@ are actively worked on by adamw, bland, and myself currently. >=20 > But actually it's not about maintainership, but about getting the ports > right! That it is. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-zRTHSnA5Os37b4eXY6u4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/ndjjb2iPiv4Uz4cRApIwAJ4k41p8W7Nhsz6S/OFA05if9ICz+ACeNuMt 9AvkAmYFhD49FOOWgywf/kQ= =6Dud -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zRTHSnA5Os37b4eXY6u4--