Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:28:27 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <20040321232827.GA57312@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3216.24.71.128.221.1079896913.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca> References: <200403210326.i2L3QQ4g064317@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> <3216.24.71.128.221.1079896913.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:21:53AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have > > duplicate LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a > > unique LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid > > overwriting each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your > > ports conflict with ports maintained by another person, please > > coordinate your efforts with them. >=20 > > dansguardian www/dansguardian-devel fcash@bigfoot.com > > dansguardian www/dansguardian fcash@sd73.bc.ca >=20 > Since these ports are marked as NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for licensing > reasons, do they need a link on the FTP server?? >=20 > If they do, I'll submit a PR (or someone can make the following change) > dansguardian www/dansguardian > dansguardian-devel www/dansguardian-devel LATEST_LINK may be used for other things too..they should still be fixed. Kris --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAXiUbWry0BWjoQKURAn0wAKDApT98lBIVdxDAW4GbVmvEGh8zrQCg1Nyu 3sw9I+W5BFKjwPKa2PSaNxE= =3pGF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040321232827.GA57312>