From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Fri Jun 24 19:36:44 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80AFAC4D99
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E401A7C
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id 8F78AAC4D98; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1D1AC4D97
 for <ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC701A7B
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [24.5.143.190]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u5OJab4W000868
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO);
 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:36:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host
 c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190] claimed to be
 yuri.doctorlan.com
Subject: Re: Any way to add USES clause depending on two options without
 including bsd.port.options.mk?
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=c3=b3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com>
References: <4e06c0b2-e70e-68e8-732b-97774cff8b2d@rawbw.com>
 <CAMwkeZwH7KqU0BG7xoX_Qeu8gZ++Z4uFhqLO79xe5v=WK5j0Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
Message-ID: <dc234792-8bc3-e1ae-e9f7-1bc91c2d92bc@rawbw.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:36:36 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMwkeZwH7KqU0BG7xoX_Qeu8gZ++Z4uFhqLO79xe5v=WK5j0Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:36:44 -0000

On 06/23/2016 14:54, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> Could you please elaborate on the reasons why you want to do that? I don't
> see how that particular combination of options would introduce a dependence
> that neither of them alone would.

In this particular case, as I figured, this isn't actually necessary. 
But it could be necessary in general, when, say, only in GUI there are 
some messages to translate, or only GUI needs python.

> And then, why not include port.options.mk? Then you could explicitly check
> for both options being set.


You are right. But without including port.options.mk Makefile looks so 
much more elegant. Several times I received e-mails asking to remove 
port.options.mk inclusion to highten the degree of elegance this way. -)


Yuri