Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:34:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl with aes-in or padlock Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409130933410.18147@wojtek.dom> In-Reply-To: <20140912004541.GQ82175@funkthat.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409111858470.1185@wojtek.dom> <20140911180258.GN82175@funkthat.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409112332160.2140@wojtek.dom> <20140912004541.GQ82175@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> MUCH faster with AES-NI. > > Well, AES-NI CBC may be faster w/ AES-NI, but it's not as fast as using > another mode... AES-XTS should be many times faster than CBC... Also, 30% maybe with geli. > above you compared two different modes... on CBC encrypt (the OpenSSL > test) and CBC decrypt (the geli test) so of course you're going to get > very different performances... > > You didn't tell me if you're using a new enough version of OpenSSL or > not.. What release are you using? iirc, 10.0-R was the first release OpenSSL 1.0.1e-freebsd 11 Feb 2013
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1409130933410.18147>