From owner-cvs-all  Tue Feb  9 08:55:48 1999
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA08524
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 08:55:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA08519;
          Tue, 9 Feb 1999 08:55:47 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from wollman@FreeBSD.org)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id IAA49373;
	Tue, 9 Feb 1999 08:55:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wollman@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 08:55:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199902091655.IAA49373@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_input.c
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

wollman     1999/02/09 08:55:46 PST

  Modified files:
    sys/netinet          ip_input.c 
  Log:
  After wading in the cesspool of ip_input for an hour, I have managed to
  convince myself that nothing will break if we permit IP input while
  interface addresses are unconfigured.  (At worst, they will hit some
  ULP's PCB scan and fail if nobody is listening.)  So, remove the restriction
  that addresses must be configured before packets can be input.  Assume
  that any unicast packet we receive while unconfigured is potentially ours.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.114     +8 -10     src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message