Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:58:07 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> To: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: send-pr must live Message-ID: <546FC37F.3000109@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMAhtp90QqB-%2BcFMazNcHt6gb6JAdy-hVz=Stvk4jKo7Vw@mail.gmail.com> References: <c288029d8c35d2b2b74b916fba005779@ultimatedns.net> <CA%2BnPUkxe2mNJN57GUpba=KkfbB_uCn4DQJsyUrYyTOwawRbH=Q@mail.gmail.com> <f41fee9b75fa92d106dc508c72296765.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> <11d24756184c5b6f3339f6e645957f86@ultimatedns.net> <546FBF60.70506@bluerosetech.com> <CAGHfRMAhtp90QqB-%2BcFMazNcHt6gb6JAdy-hVz=Stvk4jKo7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/21/2014 2:44 PM, NGie Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Darren Pilgrim > <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: >> On 11/20/2014 10:09 AM, Chris H wrote: >>> >>> As to it having been shell based. While there's nothing wrong with >>> that at all, in fact it's advantageous in many respects. I was toying >>> with the idea of perhaps converting (augmenting) it to being Perl >>> based, by way of a statically linked mini-perl interpreter. I thought >>> it would better *empower* it, also providing for a more "user friendly" >>> dialog. But, like I said; just *toying* with the idea. :) >> >> You can use any language you like; but you'll need to use Bourne if you want >> it in base. > > ... or C/C++. That's given, but I thought we were talking about scripting languages.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?546FC37F.3000109>