From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Jul  4 12:12:42 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9304F34BDBD
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Sat,  4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49zW1Q1z6Vz4b6J
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id 439EC34BA5E; Sat,  4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436A134BBE0
 for <ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2020 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49zW1P4C2xz4bYb
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2020 12:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@opsec.eu>) id 1jrh26-000Dje-GS
 for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:12:38 +0200
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:12:38 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ?
Message-ID: <20200704121238.GC39563@home.opsec.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49zW1P4C2xz4bYb
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pi@opsec.eu designates 2001:14f8:200::1
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pi@opsec.eu
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.74)[-0.738]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[opsec.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.73)[-0.731]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.054]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE];
 SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:12:42 -0000

Hi!

Trying to upgrade on a machine recently upgraded from 11.1 to 11.3,
this happens:

pkg upgrade -f pkg
Updating ... repository catalogue...
... repository is up to date.
All repositories are up to date.
The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):

Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED:
        pkg: 1.14.6 -> 1.10.5_1

Why does pkg insist on downgrading pkg ? How can this be fixed ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    Now what ?