From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 20 10:57:19 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5752937B401
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451BE43FBF
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.12.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h5KHvGMJ018010;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:57:16 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee)
Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)h5KHvGqr018007;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:57:16 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:57:16 +0300 (EEST)
From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To: Michael Carr <sphaleotas@blueyonder.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <003801c3371e$757ed9e0$1fe630d5@pbncomputer>
Message-ID: <20030620205611.V24605-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Plan9 open sourced
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:57:19 -0000



On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Michael Carr wrote:

> > Basically the new license is very similar to BSD's
>
> Theo disagrees:
> https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/2003-June/025148.html
>

He is broadly right - but note that the licence that OSI approved didn't
have (7) yet, as the licence the released under didn't have it yet - lok
at the licence diff at :

	http://plan9.bell-labs.com/hidden/osi-diff.html

so they are basicly lying about the licence being OSI approved