Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:26:09 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Frank Razenberg <frank@zzattack.org> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: epair not reachable outside host Message-ID: <6C5C0772-C34C-4AB4-BA3E-C366235B8CFD@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <4DD4CB97.4090103@zzattack.org> References: <4DD3F6AF.6070503@zzattack.org> <E5981B2D-A4D3-4BED-BB27-F715DAC25B5B@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4DD40AD2.9000602@zzattack.org> <E843F7F9-3664-4B6E-B8C1-FC313E078901@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4DD418BA.7080707@zzattack.org> <D4F178E5-2261-4119-8A5B-8E7CA23ADFE5@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4DD4CB97.4090103@zzattack.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 19, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Frank Razenberg wrote: > > What happens if you'd directly bridge it to an em(4) without the = lagg etc. in between > Thanks, you're right, taking the lagg0 out and adding em0 to the = bridge instead works indeed. Can I assume that's a bug in if_lagg then? = If so, where should I report it, the freebsd-bugs list? Yeah likely it's a lagg(4) problem then; check the PR database first: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=3Dlagg If it's there follow-up to the bug in question, otherwise I'd suggest to report it. If you can simplify the setup without VIMAGE that might help. For example em - lagg - epairNa - epairNb (IP only here) em - bridge - epairNa - epairNb (IP only here) should both just work as well I think and be good for testing. Maybe = reference this thread so people have the information: = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2011-May/thread.= html#707 Alternatively ask on freebsd-net@ . /bz --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C5C0772-C34C-4AB4-BA3E-C366235B8CFD>