From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 29 23:27:24 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A4537B401
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.econolodgetulsa.com (mail.econolodgetulsa.com
	[198.78.66.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9736E43FBF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com)
Received: from mail (mail [198.78.66.163])h5U6RJnW061409;
	Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Josh Brooks <user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com>
To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030630052545.GP30324@dan.emsphone.com>
Message-ID: <20030629232110.N57224-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: question regarding quotas
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:27:24 -0000



On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:

>
> If you're adventurous, you could use growfs :)
>

Reading the archives, it seems as if you would use growfs, but then run
into performance problems because you did not defragment afterward (and
there is no defrag utility for UFS).

Something about the performance getting worse and worse as you filled up
the grown FS, since the "go get some free space" algorithm would fail a
lot more since the first half of the disk would be packed full, and the
space you grew on would not be ?

comments ?