From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:36:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA416106566C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6572F8FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3D519E023; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:36:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0B6219E027; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:36:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49920159.9090400@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:36:09 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <200804112132.m3BLWb6x089521@freefall.freebsd.org> <4991EEE0.2050202@quip.cz> <20090210220131.M3338@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20090210220131.M3338@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/122270: [jail] [patch] jail numbers keep incrementing X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:36:15 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122270 >> >> >> Is it really commited to 7_RELENG? I am running 7.1-RELEASE and JID is >> still incrementing after each stop + start. >> In my test case, I started with 3 jails (JID 1, 2, 3), then I stopped >> jail with JID 2, start it again (now it has JID 4), stop + start and >> JID is 5, stop + start again and JID is 6... > > > It had been backed out because it gave various people various problems > and lead to races with startup/shutdown of jails an mgmt tools. > But that's been looong ago. Thank you for your quick reply. I think that it would be nice to add related informations to (closed) PRs. This is not the first time when something was backed out or not MFCd but PR stated that it is commited. Miroslav Lachman