From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 09:27:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA1B16A403 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from viktor.rosendahl@saunalahti.fi) Received: from gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8985643D49 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:27:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from viktor.rosendahl@saunalahti.fi) Received: from [10.1.1.3] (unknown [195.238.197.99]) by gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5502165B2 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:27:23 +0300 (EEST) From: Viktor Rosendahl To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:22:22 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200609261205.57901.viktor.rosendahl@saunalahti.fi> In-Reply-To: <200609261205.57901.viktor.rosendahl@saunalahti.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261222.23069.viktor.rosendahl@saunalahti.fi> Subject: Re: /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/local_apic.c and status of ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:27:26 -0000 Hi again, Looks like the kernel configuration and dmesg where removed from my post; I guess I violated the attachment policy. I put them on a webserver instead: http://viktor.fi/attach/ Sorry for the extra noise. Viktor tisdag 26 september 2006 12:05 skrev Viktor Rosendahl: > Hi all, > > I wonder, what is the status of the ULE scheduler? Is it supposed to work > at all? > > I upgraded my -stable system some time ago and it started to hang at the > end of the boot process, right before the mounting of the root device. I > found out that the immediate cause was a change > in /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/local_apic.c. > > I attach a patch that reverts the change, so that you can see what I am > talking about. However, it only hangs if I use the ULE scheduler. That's > why I wonder whether the ULE scheduler is supposed to work or not. > > Now, I understand that it might very well depend on some additional local > condition. Thus, I also attach my dmesg (of a successful boot) and my > kernel configuration file. > > best regards, > > Viktor