Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:12:39 -0500 From: "Bosko Milekic" <bmilekic@technokratis.com> To: "Peter Wemm" <peter@netplex.com.au>, "Warner Losh" <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: I386_CPU Message-ID: <00b001c08022$95a18d90$1f90c918@jehovah> References: <200101160947.f0G9lKs11014@mobile.wemm.org> <200101161813.f0GIDFs29904@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm sorry guys, I haven't been really "up-to-date" on this thread, but I was wondering: can config be made to define I386_CPU 0 if any other cpus are defined (or the inverse behavior)? (Maybe this was already done?) In the sysinstall case, I think it's safe to just exclude all other processors and use the slower I386_CPU kernel. Since the GENERIC kernel config file may contain all of the different CPU types, the config hack may ensure that we're excluding I386_CPU code. Cheers, Bosko. Warner wrote: > In message <200101160947.f0G9lKs11014@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: > : I've requested a change for UPDATING: > > It is in my queue... I have a few other entries I need to dust off. > I'll try to do that today. > > Warner > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00b001c08022$95a18d90$1f90c918>