From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Feb 14 2:48:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from columbus.cris.net (columbus.cris.net [212.110.128.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F6637B405; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 02:48:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ark.cris.net (ns2.cris.net [212.110.128.68]) by columbus.cris.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA14185; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:48:36 +0200 (EET) Received: (from phantom@localhost) by ark.cris.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id g1EAm6N08256; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:48:06 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:48:06 +0200 From: Alexey Zelkin To: Valentino Vaschetto Cc: Nik Clayton , Dima Dorfman , doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: replacement Message-ID: <20020214124806.A7765@ark.cris.net> References: <20020213230809.I92878@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from logo@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:28:26PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.5-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, > > We can always make these entities, something like > > > > &pkg.net.cvsup; > > Deadly. If we did it this way, would'nt we have to add new entities every > time we get a new port? Even though it's easier than using the > tag, I think that it would be a hassle to keep up to date with all the new > ports. I think having entities is a best solution since it will allow us to spend less efforts to maintain adding/removal/changes in ports collection (just comment out entity and pass 'make lint' thru doc/ tree to find all occurences. find and grep are more expensive) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message