Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:48:06 +0200 From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@ark.cris.net> To: Valentino Vaschetto <logo@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: <port> replacement Message-ID: <20020214124806.A7765@ark.cris.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0202131916220.9649-100000@wrath.forked.net>; from logo@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:28:26PM -0800 References: <20020213230809.I92878@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0202131916220.9649-100000@wrath.forked.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, > > We can always make these entities, something like > > > > &pkg.net.cvsup; > > Deadly. If we did it this way, would'nt we have to add new entities every > time we get a new port? Even though it's easier than using the <filename> > tag, I think that it would be a hassle to keep up to date with all the new > ports. I think having entities is a best solution since it will allow us to spend less efforts to maintain adding/removal/changes in ports collection (just comment out entity and pass 'make lint' thru doc/ tree to find all occurences. find and grep are more expensive) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020214124806.A7765>