Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:07:48 +0000
From:      Ollie Cook <ollie@uk.clara.net>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nfs send errors 32 and 35 on RELENG_4
Message-ID:  <20040114160748.GJ27744@mutare.noc.clara.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040113114525.L63732@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References:  <20040113154932.GE354@mutare.noc.clara.net> <20040113114525.L63732@carver.gumbysoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> > Jan 13 14:02:02 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: not responding
> > Jan 13 14:02:03 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: is alive again
> 
> There's some tuning options for this, which I don't immediately recall.
> Under heavy load these are somewhat normal.

Hi Doug,

I have set the kernel to auto-scale nmbclusters based on the memory in the host
in question. I think it's not worth hard-coding these values since the peak
value seems not to get near the maximum:

  root@mese:[conf] (10) # netstat -m
  397/1200/34816 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
          294 mbufs allocated to data
          103 mbufs allocated to packet headers
  215/676/8704 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
  1652 Kbytes allocated to network (6% of mb_map in use)
  0 requests for memory denied
  0 requests for memory delayed
  0 calls to protocol drain routines

If peak does get close to max, I will increase the number of nmbclusters, but
it doesn't look necessary at present.

All sysctls are at default values.

Are there other things I can be looking at tuning? These hosts do approximately
500 NFS operations each per second (appx 5Mbit/s).

> > Jan 13 14:09:37 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> > Jan 13 14:09:53 mese /kernel: nfs send error 32 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> 
> These errors tend to imply resource shortages. Monitor netstat -m output
> and make sure you aren't running out of mbuf or mbuf clusters. Also check
> for network errors and dropped packets (netstat -s, switch statistics).

Prior to power cycling the box I was able to look at netstat -m, and netstat
-i, neither of which showed anything to worry about. Next time it happens I'll
be sure to take a copy of the output, in case there's something I'm missing.

Is there any way of finding out what error 35 actually means?

> Are you running rpc.lockd?

The server is an Network Appliance F-Series filer which runs a locking manager:

root@metis:[conf] (13) # rpcinfo -p 192.168.1.1 | grep lock
    100021    4   tcp    607  nlockmgr
    100021    3   tcp    607  nlockmgr
    100021    1   tcp    607  nlockmgr
    100021    4   udp    606  nlockmgr
    100021    3   udp    606  nlockmgr
    100021    1   udp    606  nlockmgr

Thank you for your help so far.

Cheers,

Ollie

-- 
Oliver Cook    Systems Administrator, Claranet UK
ollie@uk.clara.net               +44 20 7903 3065



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040114160748.GJ27744>