From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Mar 22 21:11:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C6126DABF for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48lqvV1w0tz4dqL for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FFA449; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap36 ([10.202.2.86]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:11:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=langille.org; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=ACaBsq2Z0M+sSFHbQaq5DST5iFXJtmL LIULUc10tWOI=; b=tYhQGOe/pbtlqt7tGTKX6Fq9f2dXSVSYXBPA6JaOorq+WOo yXhkzArcOurMK3MbvJ4ccn/hAkdm/cqEJT0D3q7PmxupweloS9vW84krxSeQQswB hOoNFkZLWHKp/v7I37n2a8e/z9Fgb74G0tBm5NoLRIxn6MbL8JDZxEpwch/cGem7 8S2sIlO1v2uc0v2u9gwWImXTq4pk+N8IvfbKsG3iUto0O25EOAWhw6ivys+TrVXU 8MjP23Y0TF500Mcp87tQo0BOXUIRz1Ku2K/VTMTDV8O4PRI/EmOLbuhUgcAm4S1l fO9atXj+e79/yIB/ZErXwA9wjqvWNSVCRSbbMpw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ACaBsq 2Z0M+sSFHbQaq5DST5iFXJtmLLIULUc10tWOI=; b=vf5NH5JqVse7ZOclDRSyDD AMA7AeANPQ/ZEh+8bfCTDrHHpRMl0uztD62Lo8Uyt0KrPl/yoJvtrI+G4Stf82Kk rirSLAXp4AyKadDutdnEJCuWH6WIko6TV/Tj5+UY7ITH+tCJN1JZ+iithDHjBnXV S8TaCsugYxwvzFfYO/PfEx4+RSPnFE954GOgeiMwyYe1dxgS7W9sQp9N7SqMRECd WtGaOzMmZWplV4BppYJeHTpeqMXDyBveyxqjlcld5w8Thm9RGR7cIxTnDRiPuxzb Szo38GUBM1HM2PqHfARt58k85op3XNjLkQ3QCwy5Sk0k0PL1YXjJelT0BaTj/YbA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudegiedgudegjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfffgr nhcunfgrnhhgihhllhgvfdcuoegurghnsehlrghnghhilhhlvgdrohhrgheqnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnheslhgrnhhg ihhllhgvrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9AAF71880062; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:11:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-1021-g152deaf-fmstable-20200319v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20200322.214355.415142200.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D6568B90935EC@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200322.214355.415142200.sthaug@nethelp.no> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:11:20 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48lqvV1w0tz4dqL X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=langille.org header.s=fm3 header.b=tYhQGOe/; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=vf5NH5Jq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=langille.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan@langille.org designates 64.147.123.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan@langille.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[langille.org:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.24]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[langille.org.multi.uribl.com,messagingengine.com.multi.uribl.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[langille.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[langille.org,none]; IP_SCORE(-3.50)[ip: (-9.82), ipnet: 64.147.123.0/24(-4.92), asn: 11403(-2.69), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[24.123.147.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:11:51 -0000 On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me > > when the optic is installed: > > > > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections are quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untested modules is not supported and may cause unstable operation or damage to the module or the adapter. Intel Corporation is not responsible for any harm caused by using untested modules. > > > > I cannot use an SFP+ optic at the switch. The connection just does not happen. > > > > If I go back to the original SFP optic, the connection occurs, as expected at 1G. > > > > On the switch side, I've tried a known good optic from an existing connection. > > > > I could install an PRO/10GbE instead, that has a built-in transceiver. I have > > two of those in use now, both working on 10G. > > Have you tried connected it to something other than the Unifi switch? The only SFP+ capable switches I have are Unifi. I just tried the other switch (US-48) which had one SFP+ port free. Same issues there. > I have two Dell R430 servers running 12.1-STABLE, using Intel X520 DP > 10Gb DA/SFP+ cards with non-Intel branded LR optics. Works fine with > hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 setting - one of them connected to a Juniper > MX480 router, the other to an Extreme X670 switch. I had Extreme switches here before. They are long gone now. Nice things though. Thank you. -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org