From owner-freebsd-security Fri Nov 12 13:15:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D121F15029 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 13:15:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA18298; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 14:14:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA20606; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 14:14:41 -0700 Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 14:14:41 -0700 Message-Id: <199911122114.OAA20606@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Barry Irwin , Josef Karthauser , Brett Glass , Bill Fumerola , Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not sandbox BIND? In-Reply-To: <199911121946.LAA24616@apollo.backplane.com> References: <4.2.0.58.19991111220759.044f46d0@localhost> <19991112173306.D76708@florence.pavilion.net> <19991112212912.Z57266@rucus.ru.ac.za> <199911121946.LAA24616@apollo.backplane.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Speaking of default system configurations - what do people think about > turning off the 'ftp' service in the default configuration? Personally, I don't like it. At least, not until SSH becomes a default protocol in the system, since otherwise there is no way to transfer files to/from FreeBSD boxes easily. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message