Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:01:41 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: send-pr must live Message-ID: <fde7f2a5b5244839f4e3e7849a07e014@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <546FBF60.70506@bluerosetech.com> References: <c288029d8c35d2b2b74b916fba005779@ultimatedns.net> <CA%2BnPUkxe2mNJN57GUpba=KkfbB_uCn4DQJsyUrYyTOwawRbH=Q@mail.gmail.com>, <f41fee9b75fa92d106dc508c72296765.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> <11d24756184c5b6f3339f6e645957f86@ultimatedns.net>, <546FBF60.70506@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:40:32 -0800 Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote > On 11/20/2014 10:09 AM, Chris H wrote: > > As to it having been shell based. While there's nothing wrong with > > that at all, in fact it's advantageous in many respects. I was toying > > with the idea of perhaps converting (augmenting) it to being Perl > > based, by way of a statically linked mini-perl interpreter. I thought > > it would better *empower* it, also providing for a more "user friendly" > > dialog. But, like I said; just *toying* with the idea. :) > > You can use any language you like; but you'll need to use Bourne if you > want it in base. I'm *quite* happy with that. I have no reason to want to unnecessarily burden anyone on a freshish install, with *having* to have something other than that already provided in base. :) Thanks for the reply, Darren. I see no reason I shouldn't have something fit for review by the end of the weekend. --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fde7f2a5b5244839f4e3e7849a07e014>