Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 22:12:11 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> Cc: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, rob <europax@home.com>, Johannes Zwart <johannes@jak.nl>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all? Message-ID: <20000902221211.P72445@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021358090.22061-100000@inconnu.isu.edu> References: <20000902145603.A28852@dan.emsphone.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021358090.22061-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Galt wrote: > So why is it still forbidden in a fresh download? 4.0 is 4.0, it won't suddenly change. Ever. If you want to use ports, cvsup the latest ports tree and you will get no such error. > I have my own reasons for downloading what I did, Let me guess. You want to complain about something which has already been fixed, and you expect people to be sympathetic? > but until the un-forbid fix propagates, As it did months ago to those of us who cvsup out ports tree regularly, you mean? -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000902221211.P72445>