From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 20 23:43:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CA516A400; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA6343DD1; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2KNfjsn061819; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:41:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k2KNfjCk061803; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:41:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:41:45 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Ruslan Ermilov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060320234145.GB33003@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060320221741.GA13699@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060320230009.GA55254@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060320231604.GH83781@ip.net.ua> <20060320232746.GI83781@ip.net.ua> <20060320234006.GV35129@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060320234006.GV35129@funkthat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: mergemaster broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:43:11 -0000 On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:40:06PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Should we also document that -m is suppose to be src's etc dir instead > of src? I've accidentally pointed -m at src, and then it does a make > which is quite ammuzing as it's completely the wrong thing... Or now > that we call outside of /etc, should we make -m really point to src, > and have the proper calls add etc to the directory? > Although you may already realize this, in this case -m did not work. I haven't tried -m with ru's patch. -- Steve