Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:48:11 +0200 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>, ahze@FreeBSD.org, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: devel/gnu-libtool is scheduled for removal in less than 2 weeks Message-ID: <39DE3397-C7F1-4560-B6A2-499AD5F2EC4C@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060523010318.GX48088@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20060519122626.GA64406@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20060522015503.GK48088@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20060522141037.GA98961@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20060523010318.GX48088@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On May 23, 2006, at 03:03 , Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 22 May 2006 at 17:10:37 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote: > >> Anyway switching to devel/libtool15 should be flawless as the latter >> is now the same as the upstream libtool and does not contain FreeBSD >> specific hacks (at least this is what I heard :). > > Yes, I heard that too. But has anybody confirmed? devel/libtool15 is stock. The only FreeBSD-specific hack in there, which is not going to get punted in back upstream, is the correct handling of our versioned compilers (g++34 etc..) - -aDe (somewhere in Europe, apparently it's now time to get up. Bah, jetlag) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEcrAspXS8U0IvffwRAvWKAJ4joRNhHAeFRRsEXUuugVJV5or4OgCeJk35 nPAP8XFSx1A9K2Eke7KemKk= =k8Za -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39DE3397-C7F1-4560-B6A2-499AD5F2EC4C>