Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 11:31:17 +0100 From: Martin Karlsson <martin.karlsson@visit.se> To: "Robert A. Decker" <decker@robdecker.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: spamassassin and questions digest Message-ID: <20011214103117.GA1238@foo31-249.visit.se> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112131921560.17115-100000@adsl-63-198-218-205.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net> References: <bulk.53167.20011213184525@hub.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112131921560.17115-100000@adsl-63-198-218-205.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu Dec 13, 2001 at 07:24:25PM -0800, Robert A. Decker wrote: > Does anyone else use spamassassin? It works pretty much perfectly for me, > except for the fact that the questions-digest is usually rated as > spam. The reasons are below. It works like a charm for me; however, I dont receieve digests: Unless you split up the digest with e.g formail (called from your procmailrc), it (the digest) is _one_ message. Spamassassin (SA) assigns points based on what it finds in the message. When SA reaches 5, the message "becomes" spam. As the digest is one _long_ message, it'll be full of spam-triggers for SA. > I know I can adjust my procmailrc, but > is there a way to let the spamassassin people know that freebsd.org is a > trusted sender? Sure, just put a recipe like :0: * ^Sender: owner-freebsd-questions-digest@FreeBSD\.ORG (whatever it is..) fbsd-q-digest *before* your call to SA. Mind you, if you choose to split the digest up, then you should be able to keep your call to SA as your first recipe. > SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.5 hits, 5 required) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 5 points 'n' you're out! HTH -- Martin <martin.karlsson at visit.se> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011214103117.GA1238>