Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:15:56 +0100 From: Juraj Lutter <otis@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git tools for building in base? Message-ID: <1FD6AC93-8BDA-4242-9D8C-74425612D3CC@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <10f7b800-b015-2a80-b741-4f7db03bf6eb@quip.cz> References: <X714z7pMgNOFaTIc@rpi4.local> <20201125055425.01AA628417@elsa.codelab.cz> <10f7b800-b015-2a80-b741-4f7db03bf6eb@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 18 Dec 2020, at 14:02, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: >=20 > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: >=20 >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from = cvs to hg (Mercurial). >=20 > Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git = and why NetBSD chose Mercurial? I am using both tools at $WORK, I am = just curious what leads to these decisions. Joerg Sonnenberger had a talk about it: https://archive.fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/netbsd_and_mercurial/ At NetBSD it is not that straightforward: - git is used for pkgsrc-wip - src, xsrc and pkgsrc are in CVS and there are *plans* to move to hg, but there are no fixed deadlines when this will be done. otis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1FD6AC93-8BDA-4242-9D8C-74425612D3CC>