From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 24 23:53:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D9E106564A for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martes@mgwigglesworth.com) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.com (mail.mgwigglesworth.com [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B91E8FC08 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martes@mgwigglesworth.com) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:22:51 -0400 Envelope-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1240615371.6029.34.camel@localhost> From: "Martes Wigglesworth" Organization: MGW Networks Received: from [192.168.5.12] (192.168.5.12 [192.168.5.12]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.com; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:22:49 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3-1.3mdv2008.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Spamassassin anyone??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: martes@mgwigglesworth.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:53:35 -0000 Greetings list. I was just wondering, why don't they just run spamassassin on the freebsd lists servers????? I would cut down on spam, and I doubt would be any overhead if it were simply updated. The servers are sitting in a datacenter somewhere being managed by someone, I don't care how "donated" the server time is. What happens when there is a hardware failure??? I am sure that we are not talking to each other on a freebsd 3.0 release, so why don't they just install, and use spammassassin to capture this obvious spam??? Or am I just miss informed about how these porn, sex-toy commercials, oh, and don't forget the racist/antysemetic political garbage that come through every month or so???