From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Apr 19 4:14:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [204.97.17.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8629937B443 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 04:14:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost) by blues.jpj.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3JBEQs09385; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 07:14:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 07:14:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Trevor Johnson To: Terry Lambert Cc: Brett Glass , Subject: Re: Stallman now claims authorship of Linux In-Reply-To: <200104181725.KAA16700@usr02.primenet.com> Message-ID: <20010419065023.A5664-100000@blues.jpj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Are you saying that hiring someone to make changes to a GPL'd program > > would violate this second provision? > > No. He's saying that the intellectual property involved in a 40 > line change that results from 3 years of research should be able > to result in sufficient revenue to pay for that research. > > In orther words, brilliant ideas and hard intellectual effort > should be rewarded. The original program must have been brilliantly written, if it was worth spending so much time on the improvements. If the only way to get revenue from it is by selling binary copies and keeping the source secret, then the GPL would be an impediment. Perhaps the original author would be willing to offer you the program under some other conditions, perhaps in exchange for a share of the rewards. Wouldn't that be fair? > I think he doesn't care what > happens to the FSF after he's dead and/or after it achieves its > design goal. Good point. -- Trevor Johnson http://jpj.net/~trevor/gpgkey.txt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message