Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:18:15 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: nnd@mail.nsk.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libl.a in libipsec Message-ID: <20000329001815N.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003282300190.346-100000@alphplex.bde.org> References: <200003281201.TAA10549@wint.itfs.nsk.su> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003282300190.346-100000@alphplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It seems to me (and my buildworld agree with this) > > that 'liby' is also not necessary for building of 'libipsec'. > > liby is used. Linking to the static version of it isn't good. > I think it results in functions from liby.a being included in > libipsec.so. Since liby.a isn't compiled with -fpic, it's not > clear how this can work. I think the linker prints RRS warnings > when it doesn't work. I haven't seen those, so maybe it does > work. > > Bruce In the build after the trial change of removing liby dependency from libipsec Makefile, misteriously libipsec is not built as if it is just neglected, and buildworld continues. :-\ Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000329001815N.shin>