Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:51:41 +0200 From: "Fischer, Oliver" <plexus@snafu.de> To: David Kleiner <kleiner@panix.com> Cc: "R. David Murray" <bitz@bitdance.com>, Matthew Whelan <muttley@gotadsl.co.uk>, FreeBSD-Stable <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd test matrix Message-ID: <3DB5C86D.2010207@snafu.de> References: <20021022012432.3866.MUTTLEY@gotadsl.co.uk> <20021022072923.N83973-100000@twirl.bitdance.com> <20021022212449.GA8816@panix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Kleiner wrote: > Since the OpenGroup test suites cost $$$, unless there is a sponsor willing and > able to pay for it, all those test suites ought to be done from scratch. So do > the SPEC-like benchmarks - I am wandering away, since benchmarking is not the same > as system validation. Then there is stress test - system-wide and component > (fs, vm, net...) - and then, again, on a larger scale somebody has to buy the > boxes and put them somewhere. > > Is there a case for loosely-coupled p2p network of systems running freebsd validation > suites? Is p2p system the right architecture for this? I think what we need - for this - is a architecture with a central server to collect the results and offers statistics and information for developers and users. Reporting would be even nice. To get a mail with the information what test X on system Y failed 6 times and so on and so on... I think p2p is nice in many points, but it doesn't suite our needs. Bye Oliver -- Oliver Fischer - plexus[AT]snafu[DOT]de [de] Das Internet stammt aus dem letzten Jahrtausend! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DB5C86D.2010207>