Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:49:12 +0200 From: aaron <aaron@lo-res.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h Message-ID: <200205081449.12733.aaron@lo-res.org> In-Reply-To: <3CD8B8D3.F605B84B@mindspring.com> References: <200205071814.46995.aaron@lo-res.org> <200205071937.20043.aaron@lo-res.org> <3CD8B8D3.F605B84B@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 08 May 2002 07:34, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Thanks for answering. I was under the impression that lots of linux apps > > rely on promiscuous includes... so i expected them to be there in fbsd > > just as well.. (but my memory of linux programming times is a bit fainted > > already). > > Yes. They do. > Would smthg like "what are promicous includes and why you don't want them" be a topic for a developers (and or the ports-) handbook (at the right place)? greetings, aaron. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205081449.12733.aaron>