From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 05:53:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BCA16A4CE; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:53:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C21F43D5F; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:53:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698AE1FF91D; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:53:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id B5C041FF90C; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:53:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 4B0EF155EB; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4074E15336; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:52:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20040115041435.7B739A6@coconut.itojun.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: core@kame.net cc: FreeBSD current mailing list cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPSec fixes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:53:41 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, > bzeeb-lists> I never applied it as going through the code showed that it will not > bzeeb-lists> do the right thing(TM). See older mail. > > You wrote that the check is entirely useless. However, the patch > actually changed the behavior and fixed the problem on my box. > Without the patch, I could reproduce a panic easily by setkey. > So, I wish to hear an actuall result on your box. short answer (before CHECKER will find it ;-) : It will work *argl* but is _not_ considered to be a correct solution so please do not apply. I still consider my original patch to be correct. I will post a detailed argumentation for discussion within the next hours after I have done some other work I have to do (away from computing machines ;-). -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/