From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 8 15:22:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA00147 for current-outgoing; Wed, 8 May 1996 15:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA29998 for ; Wed, 8 May 1996 15:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id AAA20427 for ; Thu, 9 May 1996 00:20:39 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id AAA05935 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 9 May 1996 00:20:39 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA15764 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 8 May 1996 23:32:08 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199605082132.XAA15764@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: termios'ed getty To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 23:32:08 +0200 (MET DST) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199605081851.LAA26532@phaeton.artisoft.com> from Terry Lambert at "May 8, 96 11:51:08 am" X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL15 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Terry Lambert wrote: > > If nobody objects within reasonable time, i consider removing all the > > compat cruft that's no longer needed. > > I thought IBCS2 and SCO Xenix binary compatability would require > the code to stay, even if BSD itself no longer used it. Sorry, two mails expressing misunderstanding within short time... Clarification: this is _not_ about removing the compat cruft from the entire system (this is at your option by removing COMPAT_43 from your kernel config file anyway). It was only about removing the old compat stuff from getty, and just getty. This *only* affects the unability to use f0#01234:f1#01334:f2#33072-style gettytab entries any longer. (The termios counterparts for this are, of course, available.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)