From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 07:55:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E59316A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:55:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets20-024.kamome.or.jp [218.45.20.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D4D43D4C for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:54:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ume@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lyrics.mahoroba.org (IDENT:/9mmH9O+N9JUMIHTUog7GUdSPCaD7DDEi2K1mXKqlAlWiFa5Jf57DlGiN+/IAEn+@piano.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:240:96ff:fe48:4ea8]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0)i0HFsnvl043005; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:54:49 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:54:49 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: References: <20040115041435.7B739A6@coconut.itojun.org> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.11.3 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cheer.mahoroba.org cc: core@kame.net cc: FreeBSD current mailing list cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPSec fixes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:55:00 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:52:59 +0000 (UTC) >>>>> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" said: bzeeb> short answer (before CHECKER will find it ;-) : bzeeb> It will work *argl* but is _not_ considered to be a correct solution bzeeb> so please do not apply. I still consider my original patch to be bzeeb> correct. I'll follow KAME's decision. Since IPsec is from KAME, it is good to sync with KAME. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/