From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 13:10:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B3A16A4CF for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:10:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB7843D39 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:10:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1RLABbv053474 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1RLABmt053473; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:10:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402272110.i1RLABmt053473@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Brandon D. Valentine" Subject: Re: ports/63059: linux-flashplugin LATEST_LINK and RESTRICTED fixes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Brandon D. Valentine" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:10:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/63059; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Oliver Eikemeier Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63059: linux-flashplugin LATEST_LINK and RESTRICTED fixes Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:08:41 -0600 On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 01:31:36AM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > Ok, I understand what should be done here. May I make two suggestions: Thanks for reviewing this, Oliver. > - it would be nice to have the link creation in a pkg-install script, > since the autodetection fails if the port is installed from a package The port sets NO_PACKAGE and RESTRICTED. Do I still need to worry about pkg-install time? =) > - a more-or-less short comment what would be removed and why wouldn't be > bad, > (especially because this may remove symlinks not created by the port). > I'm not sure where to place this comments, though. Perhaps the pkg-install > script where the links are created is a good place. I'm not sure where the best place to put this is either. Should I just put a comment in the Makefile or do I need to print a warning to the user at install time? Thanks, Brandon D. Valentine -- brandon@dvalentine.com http://www.geekpunk.net Pseudo-Random Googlism: brandon is een experiment plaats met unieke jurysoftware