Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:45:47 +1000 From: Da Rock <9Phackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <4F213CEB.4020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F19188A.4090907@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120119005658.218280@gmx.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201191511470.19710@kozubik.com> <4F19188A.4090907@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 01/20/12 09:13, John Kozubik wrote: I normally hate to dredge up old threads, but this is like getting halfway through a story and not finding out the ending... :) What is the answer? Is there a solution to this? I have a string of questions on this: 1. Incidentally, what exactly does constitute a major release? 2. Is there a reason to update the numbers so quickly? 3. Could a higher bar be set to reach a major release than simply temporal objectives? One of the differentiating factors between linux and FreeBSD is the simple fact that linux distros tend to run so fast through the numbers- and while just a matter of perspective, it could provide some sense of stability to enterprise users. Weighed against, of course, the ability to upgrade easily. 4. If in the case of the former, could some backporting to the stable and release branches facilitate an easy upgrade to the next major release? 5. Could binaries be the answer to easier upgrades (customised for enterprise users)? I'd really like to know the OP's thoughts on this... Cheers
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F213CEB.4020207>