From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 15:25:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rr.com (rdu25-28-182.nc.rr.com [24.25.28.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169C837B79B for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 15:25:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rhh@rr.com) Received: (from rhh@localhost) by rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA01630; Mon, 15 May 2000 18:25:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rhh) Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 18:25:22 -0400 From: Randall Hopper To: Thomas Gellekum Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, IWASHITA Yoji Subject: Re: Ports silently marked BROKEN Message-ID: <20000515182522.A1610@ipass.net> References: <20000512025803.A99629@pop16.odn.ne.jp> <20000513204205.A2612@ipass.net> <20000515022343.A26691@pop16.odn.ne.jp> <20000513234432.A2445@ipass.net> <20000514182024.G511@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000513234432.A2445@ipass.net> <20000514190528.A2388@ipass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de on Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:05:36AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thomas Gellekum: |Randall Hopper writes: |> |> Thanks for the tips. It appears one reason py-opengl failed to build is |> because a dependent port, numpy, was updated. | |It was the new py-distutils. Should be fixed now with the upgrade of |py-numeric. Thanks. Numeric-15.3 works much better. I'll submit the updated py-opengl port this evening. BTW, why was the name changed from py-numeric to Numeric? Just curious; it appears the convention is for Python pkgs to start with py-. -- Randall Hopper aa8vb@ipass.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message