From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 6 10:00:38 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA13207 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 10:00:38 -0800 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA13200 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 10:00:36 -0800 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA18587; Mon, 6 Mar 95 10:54:10 MST From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9503061754.AA18587@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: Any SMP work being done? To: jha@cs.purdue.edu (John H. Aughey) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 95 10:54:09 MST Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503060039.TAA09452@labgrader.cs.purdue.edu> from "John H. Aughey" at Mar 5, 95 07:39:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I was browsing through the March 14 PC Mag and found an advertisement > for a upgrade system that turns a 486 based machine into a > dual-processor machine. It plugs into any 168-pin 486 CPU socket and > provides bays for two chips. It provides up to 256K of zero-wait-state > L2 cache for each engine and will run in single processor mode for non > SMP OS's. (p 66) Were the bays for 486, 386, or Pentium? Did it claim to follow the Intel MP spec? What did it cost, including processors (or processor, if a 486)? 800 number? Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.