From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Dec  5 15:19:27 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA11828
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:19:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lapa.isr.uc.pt (lapa.isr.uc.pt [193.136.230.54])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA11820;
          Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (paulo@localhost) by lapa.isr.uc.pt (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA01288; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 23:17:02 GMT
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 23:17:02 +0000 (WET)
From: Paulo Menezes <paulo@lapa.isr.uc.pt>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/2158
In-Reply-To: <199612051221.EAA04367@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961205230707.1280A-100000@lapa.isr.uc.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> Synopsis: Update of Mesa port
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
> State-Changed-By: jkh
> State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 5 04:03:19 PST 1996
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Committed.  BTW, was this PR really "critical?"  Are there
> users who use Mesa in life-support equipment now? :-)
> 
Not critical in that sense :))
But I would not like to have a broken port in the tree :-|
It was the first time that I used send-pr and I was somewhat surprised by
the form that was presented to me! I led me to a "what should I write?"
:))

BTW: Have you read the mail I sent you (a long time ago, while you were
somewhere) about the www mirror in freebsd.dee.uc.pt ?

Paulo