From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Fri Jul 30  0:35:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2A5156DC
	for <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA47236;
	Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:33:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Selfstyled arrogance?
References: <77276D633FA.AAA9A@po03.wxs.nl> <1286.933228878@zippy.cdrom.com> <19990729183422.A78296@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 30 Jul 1999 09:33:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:34:22 +0200"
Message-ID: <xzpk8ri382t.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> writes:
> But the page displays all those participants (including Net and Free) and
> then happily declares that they _all_ chose the Linux ELF format. [note:
> that's how I read it]

Note that they don't say *who* participated, only that they had
"someone from the FreeBSD community" or some such wording.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message