From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 01:19:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3921637B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from perimeter.co.za (obelix.perimeter.co.za [209.212.102.154])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8DD43FA3
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bsd@perimeter.co.za)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (uid 9999)
  by perimeter.co.za with local; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:19:42 +0200
From: bsd@perimeter.co.za
To: "FreeBSD Question List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:19:42 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <courier.3EFFF29E.0001814D@perimeter.co.za>
Subject: Ports Name changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:19:49 -0000

Hi all. 

Occasionally ports have their names changed (as happened yesterday with 
autoconf and automake).  Now when I run portupgrade I keep getting warnings 
that the names have changed, though there is no upgrade required. 

What steps should I follow to correct the names of my installed ports to 
match the latest names in the ports tree? 

would a portupgrade -f of each renamed port do the trick?  Or would that be 
like using a bulldozer to skim a bowl of custard? 

Regards,
Patrick.