From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 04:51:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3700816A4B3 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 04:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carebears.mine.nu (ti400720a080-2604.bb.online.no [80.212.170.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B7B43F3F for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 04:51:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from solskogen@carebears.mine.nu) Received: from carebears.mine.nu (localhost.carebears.net [127.0.0.1]) by carebears.mine.nu (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E55FA1083 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:50:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 148.121.98.136 (SquirrelMail authenticated user solskogen) by carebears.mine.nu with HTTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:50:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3293.148.121.98.136.1063972247.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:50:47 +0200 (CEST) From: "Christer Solskogen" To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: upgrading from gnome 2.2 to 2.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:51:46 -0000 I`m a bit confused. The topic on #freebsd-gnome on freenode says: "Use portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=yes ORBit2 ; portupgrade -R -m BATCH=yes gnome2 to upgrade from GNOME 2.2 to 2.4." freshports(and this list) says "portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=yes atk - portupgrade -R -m BATCH=yes gnome2" Should the portupgrade on 'atk' or 'ORBit2' be used?(or both?) -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem