From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 29 15:50: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70BF14A24 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 15:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA61539; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 15:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 15:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199911292350.PAA61539@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: RE: ports/15170: Update Port: leafnode+ Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/15170; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: tom@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: ports/15170: Update Port: leafnode+ Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 18:43:50 -0500 (EST) On 29-Nov-99 tom@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > The following patch updates the leafnode+ port. I am the port's > maintainer. > > No files have been added/removed to/from the port. If you're a committer, why don't you just commit instead of sending a PR to -ports? The only reason (it seems to me) that any committer with a port would send a message through gnats "requesting an update" is to get feedback from -ports people. Otherwise, it's just extra traffic. Do you need help with this port or something? No offense intended, just thought this was a peculiar PR. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message